<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>dialogue on Publishing House</title>
    <link>https://publishinghouse.org/tags/dialogue/</link>
    <description>Recent content in dialogue on Publishing House</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://publishinghouse.org/tags/dialogue/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Writing Dialogue That Sounds Natural on the Page</title>
      <link>https://publishinghouse.org/writing-dialogue-that-sounds-natural-on-the-page/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://publishinghouse.org/writing-dialogue-that-sounds-natural-on-the-page/</guid>
      <description>The most common dialogue mistake writers make is writing what people actually say. Real speech is full of filler, repetition, and half-finished thoughts. Read it on the page and it&amp;rsquo;s exhausting.
Good fictional dialogue sounds natural without being real. It&amp;rsquo;s edited conversation — the illusion of speech, not a transcript.
The function test
Every line of dialogue should do at least one of these things:
Reveal character Advance the plot Create or deepen conflict Deliver information the reader needs (carefully — this one tips into &amp;ldquo;on-the-nose&amp;rdquo; fast) If a line does none of these, it probably shouldn&amp;rsquo;t be there.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
